That is an interesting question. I would say that there will be places that it will be almost impossible to do anything in, and then there will be places where there is security and armistice zones that if you're very determined and shut down security systems and do everything else, you could potentially cause some mayhem. And we'll gradually build that in such a way so that, like... probably doing a terrorist attack on Terra is gonna be out of the question but there may be some space stations and stuff that are kind of in between where maybe the security isn't as close to the power of the UEE, although it does have security and law enforcement. But a determined group of pirates could for a very short period of time cause some mayhem there. And it'll sort of be... we'll have a few of those, we'll have some safe places and then we'll have some completely unsafe places, and probably the risk-reward of all those places will be factored in.So you can probably make the most money in the unsafest areas, but of course there's a higher risk. In the safe areas you don't make as much money say trading or doing stuff but it's pretty safe and you're not likely to be attacked and if you are attacked there's a lot of backup and help that would show up. But we will make it so that for instance perhaps there could be a heist in a really, like... something like the Terra system for a cargo ship full of gold bullion or something, but that heist would have to be incredibly well planned. Think of it like the "Heat" heist, at the beginning of the film "Heat" with DeNiro and Pacino - where you would have to take down all the security systems, and do all this, and coordinate, and do it all at once, and you would have a window of a very small amount of time before you get away with the loot. Those kind of heists would be much more NPC AI driven in terms of what you're heisting. So maybe that shipment is something that's getting shipped from the Bank of Terra to somewhere else and someone else gets wind of it, and it's a criminal mission and then of course it could also be players and other AI that are also performing security. So that would be really hard to do but if you managed to do it the payoff would be really big. And of course you obviously have the risk of being a wanted person and all the rest of the stuff. We'll sort of build those aspects in. So we're going to have areas that we'll let that kind of gameplay work and, like I said, potentially there can be some less safe space stations. But there will definitely be some places that aren't just going to let you go in and destabilize. So like Terra or Earth - those kinds of one's will be pretty safe havens, and even when you go down onto them, to pass through the customs or immigration you'll have to cash in or pass in your weapons that you have. You can't take any weapons with you and they'll scan you going through and I think if you look at the ArcCorp you'll see the scanner setup and everything.So you have to land on the outside and pass through Customs and it's all sort of secure. And there'll be some places that don't have that I definitely think Nyx (or really Levski) will be less secure in the long run and that would have more "law on the ground" so to speak. So if you went in there and everyone took a gun and they started shooting, then maybe the local Police guys would come after you. But that's sort of the things we'll play with. So there'll definitely be places that will be safe and there'll be places that won't be safe. And that'll be kind of up to you and what sort of challenge you're interested in.
Longer-term absolutely being able to rent and get bigger hangar space will be something that we will have as a game feature. Also, I think, depending on how you play, you may actually want to have some of your ships in various areas around the universe, depending, I mean, obviously, we just have the Stanton system, there isn't as much need for that as possible.But as you can already see, there's different kinds of gameplay based on different kinds of ships, so like Hornet is great for dogfighting but it's really- well it can't carry cargo, so you may need a cargo ship – Starfarer or a Hull C or a D, you may also want to go and do a mercenary mission and that may even mean that you want to take a Hornet or something like that with it. So the idea- maybe there's some missions or adventures that you want to do on one side of the known UEE universe and maybe there's some stuff you want to do over here.I could definitely see at the point where you've acquired a fair amount of wealth in the game and a fair amount of ships that you may actually have – just like rich people in the world do now, they have houses in different cities – I think you could potentially own hangars in different planets with some of the ships you have, so depending on where you are you'll always have somewhere you can go quickly to switch out a ship – because you're only going to ever be able to switch your ships based on where they are in the hangar. So if I am operating seven systems away from my homebase and I've got twenty ships in my home hangar and I want to change out one of my ships, I have to go all the way back to my homebase, or have someone fly it out to me just to change out that ship, so a lot of times, I would think if you said "oh, I'm going to operating in this system and do some trading here", you may want to have a sort of almost "forward operating base" that you would have some of your ships in.I definitely think you'll be able to rent stuff and have more- and customize your hangar too, so in the persistent stuff that we're doing, that we are going to start to roll out, you are going to be able to customize your hangar in terms of place where your flair is. And eventually sort of expand it out and buy some extra space or some extra rooms and do all that, and the only caveat that would have is potentially a sort of rendering caveat. So at some point if you had seventy ships and you wanted to see them all on one long run, that's probably more than we could render at once, which is one of the reasons why we had limited hangars to a certain extent and then you could pick which ships you could have in the hangars, just essentially to not have the machine go to five frames-per-second.Now, we're optimizing things, so that will definitely be bigger but probably- there's not likely to be a case where you would have this sort-of "Raiders of the Lost Ark" hangar that goes as far as you can possibly see with as many ships as you can see. But I will promise that we will try to get as many ships in as we can, so ultimately I think it will move towards something that you would like, although I'm not sure it could have every single ship in it... but, it potentially will. Of course, the hangars won't be able to have very biggest ships in because they'll have to stay in orbit. But anyway, there you go. Not sure if that answer helped you out that much, but that's kind of what the plan is.
The reason why we are doing that is because... so the people that actually are building the ships to put them in the game is a completely different group of people than who do the concept and design of ships. The reason why we're continuing to concept ships now is because the whole idea is with the universe, especially once its up and running, it's going to be like the real world. There will be different... new models of ships coming out, and new variations and things for people to earn money towards so they can buy this new ship that comes out or buy this new gun or buy a little piece of real estate. Everyone needs goals for the game and so we want to keep a constant supply of ships and weapons and other features for people to work towards acquiring and then use in the game.So, we really need to keep the pipeline going so there's been a few cases where we've just stopped on the pipeline and then it kind of dried up for a while which isn't a good thing.So you'll see now that we're pretty steadily delivering ships into the hangar and delivering ships into a flyable state because we have a pretty large team of 3D modelers, technical artists all working on the ships and technical designers all setting them up.The concept side is the front end of that pipeline so we're continuing to flesh out the various ships that we think we want in the ecosystem because you want to fly around in the universe of Star Citizen and it should feel like a busy, alive universe with variety and all sorts of things. Whether it's ships or equipment you can use or even races, we want to make it teeming and real and it's been there for hundreds, millions of years.It should feel like a living, breathing universe so as part of that we need to complete pipeline to carry on because right now if we don't do some of the concepts by the time some of the modelers have finished they won't have new stuff to roll onto. So, that's kind of the plan that is encompassed, and so we continue to work on some of the concept stuff to make sure that we have a pipeline and some of the ships may be not in the hangar right now are already in process in the background with the modeling team.That is why - to maintain the pipeline. Because our goal is to basically to constantly be adding content, even when the game is what we would consider "live release" or whatever, we will constantly be adding all sorts of things to it. So content in terms of ships and equipment, clothes, characters, missions, star systems, all those sort of things... and functionality and features we'll continue to add. Part of that is ships which is why you have concepts happening as well as the modeling. So, "different folks - one isn't blocking the other," I guess would be the easy way to answer that.
So we are definitely going to do cataclysmic events, acts of God. That will be more us on the PU, whatever you want to call it, sort of "game master" side, where we'll look at what's happening around in the universe and then we'll create occasional pockets of chaos - maybe there's a famine over here, maybe there's a bit of civil war breaks out over here - that will create events and missions for the players and the AI to participate in.So we'll look at it and there will be places where people may have to give aid, or come into fight off a Vanduul incursion or all sorts of stuff, and potentially space stations or who knows, a planet, could even get raised. But that would all be, I guess overall manipulation of the full PU to riff off what all the players are doing out there, kind of what the AI is doing in it's sort of systemic way, and then we sort of - like throwing a pebble into a smooth pond - put a few pebbles here and there to create ripple effects to create a little interest. So yes we will definitely be doing that.
So on the Idris and the Bengal we're not really going to have a catapult system to the same level. We have a little bit where I think ... I don't know if we showed it but there's some blast ... I don't know what you would call them ... shields that come up on the flight deck so when the Gladiuses lift off and thrust away it will shield the back of the flight deck from from the blast shield.But essentially the take off mechanism will be a lot like, if you remember the original Squadron 42 trailer that Hannes did and you saw the Hornets lift up like this [hand hovering over desk] to a hover position and then "whoosh" accelerate out. So that's essentially how most single seat fighters will launch.Coming in it will be the same ... they'll come in and arrest ... they'll have to match velocity with the ship they are landing on, the Bengal or the Idris or whatever other ship they are landing on, and then they'll come in, match velocity and land.It's actually trickier than one would think. We are actually doing landings on Idrises at the moment on the development side and there's been a few cases of people smashing in Idris and the side of the walls. So one of actually the tasks we're working on for the landing system is to also have an automated landing system for alignment and bringing you in. Because unless the ship you are landing on is not moving it actually becomes fairly tricky. So if have, say, the Idris doing 100m/s and you're trying to land, you're actually landing faster and you've got to be ... and if it's doing any movement changes and you're doing any it can be ... it can be challenging!So we'll have the ability to hook into the "auto landing system" or land manually yourself but it will be the same kind of landing pad mechanic where you'd come in, and as you came in ... so basically you come in at 200 ... the IFCS would actually adjust your velocity so that as you come inside you're of course entering the ship itself so you're inheriting the ship's velocity, so if I was going 200m/s and entering and Idris at 100m/s, once I've crossed the threshold I really ... relative ... would be travelling 100m/s to the Idris flight deck. Of course we don't really want to be travelling at 100m/s while we are entering way to fast: you'd probably want to be entering around a hundred and ... if the ship was going 100m/s, the Idris, then you probably want to end up entering into it at around, I don't know, 120m/s or something?So there will be skill in doing it but it will be more the landing pad and just making sure you are coming through the opening in the door.
So, if we're talking about repairing you as a player. Definitely the better or the deeper fixing up, which is what we call targeted healing, will require some element of skill. So, the simple one is bam, med pen, just give myself a quick... whatever... whatever in the future we're doing it - the sort of cortisone, steroid boost... adrenaline shot gets you back into it - but to actually do repairs some greater damage we're going to have a certain amount of skill in terms of targeting and being able to apply it and all the rest of the stuff.I would say to a certain level we probably have that on a more complicated repairing as well. Maybe if you're patching up a hole or something like that we... is the same kind of idea of mechanics for we've been talking about for mining where there's a certain amount of skill in drilling, using a laser at a certain frequency, gauging how much your frequency is, kinda what the vibration of the rocks that you are drilling into, whether you are possibly penetrating some dangerous gases or the rest of the stuff.So, we will try to have some of the higher level stuff requires some skill and the lower level stuff like I said, just a med pen is bam, pop it, give you a sort of short-term boost. But to really fix someone up or some ship up we're going to have some level of player skill.
This is something we've debated internally. The conflict with it is, we want to cap your individual player velocity so it doesn't become too big to control or arrest. For instance your EVA pack doesn't have nearly the amount of fuel or thrust power that say, for instance, your spaceship would necessarily have. Although the other flip side of that, is that you should inherit the velocity of your parent object. So if you step off a Freelancer that's going 200 m/s, I should probably be flying 200 m/s, or moving at 200 m/s.We sort of go back and forth on our debate on this because essentially what happens is the EVA system has several thresholds. One, it has a normal one which is 15 m/s, and then it has the "boost" one, which is 50 m/s maybe 100 m/s, I honestly can't remember what that is. Those are the ranges that it caps you in, in the same way that ships themselves are capped.Don't forget that there is only a certain amount of thrust on your EVA pack. So there's a certain point where, just for instance if you were like designing it so people couldn't get themselves in trouble, you probably would cap how fast you would let them accelerate to because they would need to have enough thrust available for them to decelerate back down to zero; or else you would get up to a certain speed and you would never be able to stop unless someone else stopped you. As an individual in an EVA suit, getting stopped when you're at a fast speed would either be very painful, fatal, or would take someone a lot of care to do. That's kind of it. We sort of have the trade off. I would think that what we would probably do, is if you went out EVAing at speed, you would go out at speed and it would bleed your speed down to a more controllable amount, but you should inherit the velocity of your parent ship. I don't know whether we'd let you open the airlock doors and get out when you're in cruise or anything really fast. At precision mode, definitely, SCM, again that would depend on the speeds you were doing.
Again, that's another good question. So, we haven't made a hard and fast rule of it, so the plan is for the current mini PU, especially when we started with persistence which will have some currency, it'll be Alpha UEC, and Alpha UEC we can reset at any time. We will still let you spend some of the actual proper UEC that you guys have collected or have been given and in that case we won't reset things that you've bought with that.I think I mentioned this last week that we also won't take those things back if you've bought them with them and we'll let you trade them in for the full UEC price whereas on the Alpha UEC it'll be more like how the final implementation will be where it's as if it's like if you buy a new ship, or a new weapon and you come back to sell it back again, it will have taken some depreciation.So, will it occasionally reset stuff? I think until we have the dynamic economy working over quite a few star systems we won't have felt like everything's balance and free of exploits and glitches. So until then we probably will reserve the right to reset stuff, but there may very well be a case before we consider it final, "Go Live", that we just decide: "no, this is it, we're switching to proper UEC, everything is stable enough, and we'll go from here." And things that from that point on that you build up or earn would stay with you, although, to be honest with you, that probably is a pretty good definition of "Go Live".That's kind of it, like I said, not a hard and fast rule but those are kind of the thinking that we have as we're approaching it.
That is a pretty good suggestion I would ... we haven't necessarily thought about that but one way probably to do that would be to allow someone that goes into a ship dealer to potentially boot up a quick sim, which is essentially what we do in Arena Commander, to allow you to feel the sim version of the ship around and feel it for a bit. So maybe you get a token to use that ship inside the Arena Commander sim-pod to see if you like it or not. And then perhaps you can go buy it.So we'll consider that because I think that's actually a pretty cool in-fiction, in-game way for people to maybe do a test drive. So, thanks Mattheus!
So I'm assuming that you mean the Stanton system which is sort of where Crusader is based and we just really have the area around Crusader although we are planning on expanding it in the near future to have the whole star system in. So that will be a whole bunch more. That will come with the debut of procedural planets and a few other things, so that's something to look forward to. But generally you'll have Skyline which is an app on your mobiGlas which will be your personal sort of Star Map so not too dissimilar to what you can do on the web.And then we'll have a more in depth Nav Map that ships will have. Especially the bigger ships that have charting and stuff like that. So like the Carrack will have sort of a big Holo Table with a Star Map that you can manipulate and look around. The ships with the more sophisticated Nav Computers will allow you to do more planning, sharing Nav Points and charting things with your friends as you just generally explore stuff. So yes you will have all that. That's actually one of the key features when we expand out Stanton system to allow you to adventure out. So it's actually in work, it's in development. It's a fair amount of engineering, and we've got a bunch of earlier UI/UX that has to debut first but it definitely will be there. So you won't get lost, and also will be able to message your friends or give out your location and stuff like that.